<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The precarious ledge of Relevance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edchao.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/the-precarious-ledge-of-relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edchao.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/the-precarious-ledge-of-relevance/</link>
	<description>"Do not be grieved, for the joy of the Lord is your strength."  Neh 8:10</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Hauck</title>
		<link>http://edchao.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/the-precarious-ledge-of-relevance/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Hauck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edchao.wordpress.com/?p=555#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>That was a close one, for a second there, I thought you were referring to a flash bang altar call accompanied by cathartic ccm melodies for the hormonally melodramatic. 

Is that really &quot;relevance&quot;? I totally agree with what you said, that we need to be speaking to people so that they listen and understand, not as though we are speaking at a wall. When I hear, &quot;We need to be relevant&quot;, I hear someone thinking about changing the essential content, not how it is communicated. I think what you&#039;re saying is, &quot;We need them to see how relevant Scripture really is!&quot;, to which I firmly agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a close one, for a second there, I thought you were referring to a flash bang altar call accompanied by cathartic ccm melodies for the hormonally melodramatic. </p>
<p>Is that really &#8220;relevance&#8221;? I totally agree with what you said, that we need to be speaking to people so that they listen and understand, not as though we are speaking at a wall. When I hear, &#8220;We need to be relevant&#8221;, I hear someone thinking about changing the essential content, not how it is communicated. I think what you&#8217;re saying is, &#8220;We need them to see how relevant Scripture really is!&#8221;, to which I firmly agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
